Wake up Jake. No longer can we depend on those who try to kill us thinking that they ultimately want whats best for us...
Does your address bar say https? If not change it to https:// for a more secure connection to this site.
Showing posts with label Climate Engineering Conference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Engineering Conference. Show all posts
Monday, 3 November 2014
Black Genocide: Declassified Docs Reveal Genocide Caused By Chemtrail Testing
Wake up Jake. No longer can we depend on those who try to kill us thinking that they ultimately want whats best for us...
Saturday, 6 September 2014
WHY WE SHOULD NOT ENGINEER A GLOBAL THERMOSTAT
Can science fix climate change? A case against climate engineering
By Mike Hulme (King's College London)
By Mike Hulme (King's College London)
The Climate Engineering Conference in Berlin this August is providing a venue to debate in as open as way as possible the political, scientific, economic, ethical and cultural implications of this wide array of technologies. This is important to do because the consequences of implementing some of these technologies are wide-ranging and decisions should not be made by default or without public scrutiny. In my recently published book ‘Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering, I critique one specific climate engineering proposal, namely to deliberately introduce sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere to regulate global temperature.
My argument is that the putative technology of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) offers a triple fantasy: first, that the risks of a changing climate can be defused effectively by regulating global temperature; second, that the world could ever agree on the level at which to set the thermostat; and, third, that the unintended consequences of such intervention are manageable. Creating a global thermostat as a response to climate change is an inadequate solution to a wrongly framed problem. READ MORE >>
© Source: ce-conference.org (Climate Engineering Conference 2014)
My argument is that the putative technology of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) offers a triple fantasy: first, that the risks of a changing climate can be defused effectively by regulating global temperature; second, that the world could ever agree on the level at which to set the thermostat; and, third, that the unintended consequences of such intervention are manageable. Creating a global thermostat as a response to climate change is an inadequate solution to a wrongly framed problem. READ MORE >>
© Source: ce-conference.org (Climate Engineering Conference 2014)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)